Balvinder Sambhi

[Balvinder Sambhi]

Forum-Info:  Dieses Kommentarfeld war leer (kein Beitrag von Balvinder Sambhi). 
In diesem Thema werden Kommentare gesammelt, die aus anderen Themen verschoben wurden. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

Egoist wrote 6 hours ago:

 

Hey, soon, Winner

 

your experiences with progressive betting are pretty weak.

 

1. You can not estimate when you hit the goal, for this you may need a long breath.

2. Your system from post # 1 claims 20 stories, after 10 for waiting. The return is literaly nothing despide to your bankroll.

3. Your bankroll is not capable of even hit the limit.

4. The limit cuts down your 20 stories by far.

5. You dont know, that waits for deviation of random, does nothing to the results, but eating your lifetime.

 

If your signal hits the first place, you get 200% win.

The problem is, this is 200% from risked money, not from bankroll.

 

If your signal hits the second place, you get 100% win.

The problem is, these are 50% from risked money, not from bankroll.

 

I am too lazy to do the math for you now, but it is very possible to design a game for earning 50% everytime a hit occours.

BUT this 50% has nothing to do with your bankroll, it's 50% of revenue.

 

Forcing the roulette to pay 50% of your payroll dayly, means a high risk game with 3-5 steps and no progression.

We call this in german "chance degression".

 

 

Dear German speakers in the forum, do not be sorry if you can not read this without help,

There is nothing new in it.

 

 

Greetings from the ego

egoist

1. 10,000,000 spins of data I will hit my goal.

2. I want to win 50% £5,000 per day RRS BANK SYSTEM against bankroll

3. Most roulette tables £5- £ 500 or £1000 per number. Within tables limits.

4. I play live casino not a dream of winning!

5. I am the only proven Winning Roulette Player in the world!

6. You play with money not buttons, cash is bankroll.

7. £5000 from £10,000 is 50% you can not do simple Math!

8. You do not know my system so how do you deduced 3-5 steps? Stupid guessing!

 

This is why gamblers will never win because they are stupid gamblers who do not study the game. 10,000,000 live data spins. That's the difference between losing and winning!

[Balvinder Sambhi]

vor 15 Stunden schrieb Albatros:

I do not understand that????

Bentley I would prefer.

So you do not sell?

What a pity!

albatross

Email me i will discuss further. [email protected]

[Balvinder Sambhi]

no one has lost with my systems!

[Balvinder Sambhi]

Losing gamblers find my annoying!

 

I love this winning show losing gamblers how not to lose! 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

verschoben von Man kann Roulette nicht schlagen

 

 

todays win! 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

STICKS AND STONES! 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

Am 27.2.2009 um 21:47 schrieb kingmo:

Hi Guys!

I have only one modest question!

Is there a system in roulette (with a 0), with which you have no loss but no profit?

Background of the question is a disagreement between a work colleague and me.

I think there is no such system, my colleague thinks there is such a roulette

System.

We have made a bet of who is right. (It's about 10 euros.)

That's why I need professional answers, if your so nice.

Kind regards

 

there is ONLY MY SYSTEMS WITOUT LOSS IN THE WORLD! 

 

 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

[Balvinder Sambhi]

ALL EC SYSTEMS FAIL EVERYDAY! 

 

THIS RUN HAPPENS EVRY DAY IN EVERY CASINO AT SOME POINT!

 

 

verschoben von System ohne Verlust

[Balvinder Sambhi]

I speak roulette! You chicken not take my challenge! 

 

Take my challenge in a live casino? yes or chicken!

[Balvinder Sambhi]

13 hours ago saxon wrote:

 

Speak German!

Or Hindu.

 

I SPEAK ROULETTE! YOU SPEAK LOSING!

[Balvinder Sambhi]

SAXON EATING CAT SHIT LOBSTER WHEN LOSING EVERY DAY

!

 

[Balvinder Sambhi]

This is the ANSWER! YES!

 

 

 

verschoben aus dem Thema Mathematische Lösung für Roulette

 

[sachse]

vor 7 Stunden schrieb Balvinder Sambhi:

This is the ANSWER! YES!

 

 

 

verschoben aus dem Thema Mathematische Lösung für Roulette

 

 

Arme Sau!

[4-4Zack]

vor 7 Stunden schrieb Balvinder Sambhi:

This is the ANSWER! YES!

 

 

 

verschoben aus dem Thema Mathematische Lösung für Roulette

 

ich bin sanfter als sachse kranker ,dummer,und vermutlich natürlich auch armer spinner.