Mellis

If i understand it correct you want to learn about advantage play - i read some of the replys and it was boring - buth that is what you get out of the community being protecting to certan degree. I do not give away things on a silver plate - but i can point my finger to does directions you should aim for. You can start with VB2 and the DS wish they mention in same section at myrulet. Read new and old posts about RC and other things wish will in the end as you start your new jorney to calibrate things and find your path. I would recommend that you buy LS advance book wish at least give you a sofware and a period of time at the spin-zone - where you will find some very good things if you back track and read old and new posts. LS know many things and will help you with all your questions to a certan degree. PB yes that is good and start with hes last book and go backwards and find correlation wish has been mention above. I assume that if you follow what i tell you - then after a certan time depending on your learning curve you will thank me for this. Does who not ask has nothing to gain. Maybe one day you start to think twice about what you post - wish is a good sign. O_o

If you want to get your hands on a roulette computer - i would say FFZ - my opinion - but my advice is not to invest money into that path. My opinion is that you will do as well using a thumper in your mobile phone or develop a good head count and using how the norm calibrate wish will give you the same accuracy as any FF for sale - i would not suggest sound patterns as it is very advance but i assume you could apply it to certan degree to find the moment to key when to glance at the wheel. You just need a littel knowledge :-) and yes it takes time and is a long jorney to succed - but at least if you want to be lazy you will gain a edge using FFZ - but you still need some basic skills to operate that kind of roulette computer - even with the other models of FF you have to have certan degree of skills and knowledge - there is actualy no short cut - it is important to know that. I assume if you invest money in good material and hang around different internet forums you will succed to make contact and build trush during your jorney - wish can lead to that some one decide to pass over some knowldedge and get you started. Have a nice day. O_o

I use babel fish to translate and read the topics and could not find PM function using it - so here it is - pompado2010@hotmail.com When u look for a wheel - Huxley with 8 deflectors - this is important to know as follows. The aesthetic appearance of the roulette wheel is what determines how expensive or cheap it is. Then determine how old wheel is also affecting the price. A good buy at low cost is to buy a Huxley who is not as beautiful but with good ball track - with good CONDITIONS. The aesthetic of a wheel can get the price to be unnecessarily expensive. We do not use a wheel to enjoy its beauty. We use a wheel for a different reason O_o

I assume its about getting a wheel - correct ?? PM me and i give u my contact wish can deliver that wheel. All from old to almost brand new from factory at x contry. O_o

If you want to trade i will offer u the following - i would not trade how to spot defects - but i could show u how you beat modern wheels for bias where you can make your own simulations and tell the difference what is due to random fluctaion and what is not due to random fluctaion using a specific playin model - short avoid all does false postives and know the true difference. If ok i have to ask for preimission to do so. Or you can name a price wish i would prefer is lower then does at amazon or ebay. O_o

Kaisan does not need to teach me about sound signature or other things - i find a way to collect them for real - i start to build a small libary using the same method as taking lap/split times - i notice a variation from a grind joint comparing to my old huxley at home wish have a new ball track and with does at my local international casino - i go deep into it and not just key clattering wish become sworfh. I use audio software and tweak and take a closer look at does sampels i have. The point is regarding any VB method is that many old things in the past is a part of the new age of andvantage play. Sure i hear all kind of good things about Sachse - but i do my own home work based upon parts wish is not public or that you can find on internet in a public forum ... sure hints can lead to many things. There is so many different kinds of VB and in the end when some one has the knowledge of middel or higher they can move forward with out wait for some one to hand some-thing over on a silver plate - we all have the abiltiy to collect and measuring what is what and improve and find new solutions. I want mention any name but one forum wish deals with a famous succes full roulette computer brand - was impressive at first - but as time pass by you start to notice wish false postives they are based upon. Exampel taking one spin development and base that upon how you key the norm using two turnarounds wish can lead to false postives - where a sampel of least 20 lap/split will show a wheels true ball track and ball behavior wish you base futher on your ability to key the norm - some methods works on certan wheels and some does not - as huxley is easy to find the average around 0.9 1.0 1.1 and with other wheels around 1.5 and where you can not apply same method wish force some one to use different playing model. Just speak free from mind ... Regarding Pierre Basieux i assume it depends on wish eyes read and observe what he has to say wish will lead to if it is any good or not. The old is part of the new and good basic foundations of what has been done and what is being done today is a good overview wish only can lead to deeper and better understanding. O_o Translations takes time and there is also a book from Chriss wish i would like to buy.

greetings - mauvecard ... I come from Abba contry :-) I just ? but reach a point where i start to look back on old work wish has been done regarding visual ballistics. It had been cool to start to know new pepole in EU and maybe team up with some on wish is on same page as me. I take my first trip to x and y wish has ?? casinos to explore the market for certan things using defect spotting wish save time and effort and dont wast time to collect data with out any real pontential and hope for luck would strike me. I go 27th but would not brag or claim being semi pro even if i have the knowledge. O_o

Thanks I know its heavy to translate as i do with hes latest book - i use babel and it works. O_o

Do some one know where i can find a complete list of the books Pierre Basieux wrote or if he still has a site up running - he did before but i have lost the link. Many thanks.

HAHAHA as this was the first time a get this message O_o

I am going to be honest with you all - i dont use or play even money bets - it is just that no one can compete with the knowledge i have regarding even money bets. I only know one and it is Laurance wish claim have some kind of poitive expectation and get it verify by Snowman. It just strike me after study Marigny for many years that two states and two isolated attacks for every attempt to capture correlation of correction is more effective then to aim for raw correction. Saying it does not exist is just being stupid. O_o

Give me that slow knowing smile +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 +8 +1 +1 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +8 +1 +1 +11 +11 +1 +8 +11 +11 +11 234 units flat betting O_o

Now i skip all previos march variation at previos post using my method of "correlation correction" and aim with the TPM = The Perfect March. I start to test it with advance strategy 731 and i have to say it is beatiful. Thank you Marigny. Here is a short exampel and it is for 40 sessions i will see what the net gain will be. I just post 12 session and alredy serios amount of units. +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 106 units in 10 000 trails using one even money position. O_o

I took the new development that has been made upon Marignys work and concentrate on the Perfect March. I imporve it with using correlation of correction instead of raw correction. My first test using only one even money position gave me an amazing positive expectation. This i think will be a very good option for real play with larger units with 100 Euro value. Here is a simpel test and i only use random org as it is pure random and based upon noise. Flat betting with 6 attempts where +1 overcome the amount of attempts. The Perfect March. My own depelopment. 2010 07 29 to 2010 08 31. +1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 32 won 0 loss 32 net I understand why there is so littel response to what i write. Many claim but can not prove what they claim. I welcome any one to prove me wrong. O_o

Sorry the caculation was wrong i miss one -28 hehehe as that would matter LOL Flat betting - Advance strategy 731 random org 20100725 / +8 +11 -28 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 / won +54 units / loss -28 units / total gain +26 units random org 20100726 / +1 +1 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 / won +44 units / loss -0 units / total gain +44 units random org 20100727 / +1 +1 +1 -28 +11 -28 +1 +8 +11 -28 / won 34 units / loss -84 units / total gain -50 units random org 20100728 / +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 / won 106 units / loss -0 / total gain +106 Result: +92 units Won 176 units / loss -84 units / total net gain 92 units Note. With reduce of % on zero during play. Now it should be correct i just do things so quick as i just enjoy it. Assume 70 Euro units then we have 920 Euro and with 700 Euro units we would have 9200 Euro.

Flat betting - Advance strategy 731 random org 20100725 / +8 +11 -28 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 / won +54 units / loss -28 units / total gain +26 units random org 20100726 / +1 +1 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 / won +44 units / loss -0 units / total gain +44 units random org 20100727 / +1 +1 +1 -28 +11 -28 +1 +8 +11 -28 / won 34 units / loss -48 units / total gain -14 units random org 20100728 / +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 / won 106 units / loss -0 / total gain +106 Result: +162 units Won 176 units / loss -14 units / total net gain 162 units Note. With reduce of % on zero during play.

Does any one get negative results

Note. It is still on experiment state - wish is base upon 3x2 chops indications wish also is based upon correlation of correction. I have not test this for Ecart around 2.0 or 2.5 wish also could be an option. =_0

This post is for does who not can understand or make there own observation and develop a march - so her it is on a silver plate - but you have to verify it with your own statistics. Note. This is flat betting with a total of four attempts. The march can develop to using attmepts around 4 6 8 10 steps to find different variance - but my short test show the cut goes around four and six. 1) Rule number one is to wait for two series to chop, the formation of two seris look like this RRRBBB and after that formation appers you attack twice and gain +1 unit. If you don´t get a straight hit with three series in a row like this RRRBBRR you will have the following formation RRRBBRRB and aim for it to hovering with your secound bet RRRBBRRBRRRR if at zero you just follow the betting behavior, the march, until +1 or -2 being your first attack. 2) If you dont get two series to chop as i mention above you make your first attack when a state of hovering appers and it looks like this RRRBRRR and play that next formation will be followed with a serie like this RRRBRRRBB if not you will have the following formation RRRBRRRBR and would play it will continue to hovering and ride it out until +1 or -2 being your first attack. 3) If first attack fail you would repeat the betting singals above for one more attack with the difference that you dont aim to win +1 and now aim to break even because that would give you one less formation of correction wish appers more regulary then an longer correction to end up with +1 and this is a way to make the play more stabel with good results. Result: +1 +1 +0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +0 +1 +1 +0 +1 -4 +1 +1 +1 +0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 31 won 4 loss 27 total gain Previos post you could read about isolate with one even money postition to limit variance of fluctation - wish this results are based upon. Random org 2010 07 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 O_o

This march i mention does not work - but is good for study and observations. This is the same as above but you attack after the first serie to apper after four series as tendency indication. +1 +1 +1 -3 +1 +1 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.04:39 events --------------------------------------- 16 8 16 22 34 3 2 17 25 11 19 19 10 1 27 18 16 12 10 14 24 31 24 25 12 32 17 19 6 9 13 3 20 32 27 10 16 26 14 1 32 35 5 14 24 36 1 20 7 22 23 11 9 20 16 *** 30 3 30 34 22 15 15 26 19 7 35 5 31 5 18 24 35 19 34 7 19 24 11 5 34 4 18 25 19 17 26 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.06:47 events --------------------------------------- 13 27 2 11 27 15 7 4 16 22 8 11 22 29 32 15 12 12 10 34 8 33 29 33 34 9 7 18 19 19 20 36 33 8 33 22 21 11 33 9 31 25 2 29 13 4 23 6 10 23 33 31 10 34 17 2 24 20 2 33 16 17 16 6 18 11 22 19 20 3 24 5 14 36 25 3 14 30 24 34 24 34 22 *** 2 15 14 14 7 24 3 16 23 10 9 3 19 8 25 25 14 4 28 30 8 19 21 17 32 34 2 1 2 17 13 29 11 14 12 1 19 13 11 18 27 21 4 7 6 28 32 21 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.13:20 events --------------------------------------- 31 29 19 10 7 4 21 13 7 29 8 25 6 25 8 21 3 2 13 13 10 10 15 32 10 9 31 1 4 *** 31 31 30 19 6 35 23 12 36 27 8 2 12 30 22 16 7 23 33 1 -1 17 10 30 12 +0 35 24 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.00:16 events --------------------------------------- 12 30 3 36 32 28 5 10 7 6 7 36 20 27 19 14 14 28 1 11 25 28 27 11 34 *** 13 15 7 19 23 8 20 7 9 11 22 15 20 29 36 18 4 10 3 26 -1 23 30 20 14 -2 32 8 12 -3 25 32 21 5 22 2 31 20 16 33 16 27 8 29 33 5 7 14 20 6 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.13:20 events --------------------------------------- 16 26 12 35 11 1 15 36 28 5 28 5 17 5 25 17 27 32 22 7 15 5 31 *** 6 6 9 28 10 30 14 19 25 31 14 12 18 5 35 2 31 10 16 33 16 13 11 34 36 18 27 11 27 2 30 26 19 19 12 26 6 16 35 26 33 2 15 29 16 16 25 31 33 20 28 6 19 36 2 18 36 29 35 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.00:16 events --------------------------------------- 30 30 8 25 26 12 32 22 18 15 9 24 27 30 1 14 27 20 7 6 27 15 32 *** 18 27 24 19 7 4 33 4 4 36 13 11 13 9 6 10 14 24 28 33 8 13 3 9 29 6 18 26 30 1 12 6 32 20 18 10 27 19 19 25 19 30 36 3 24 17 20 18 27 3 25 27 27 20 35 36 5 18 22 34 5 8 4 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.02:28 events --------------------------------------- 23 7 32 34 19 31 12 11 18 28 16 10 18 17 14 1 35 30 5 1 16 16 17 3 4 15 10 3 13 4 11 6 29 6 31 19 8 31 25 20 32 31 14 33 5 35 *** 7 1 29 32 7 9 15 10 36 22 14 25 5 7 29 2 7 4 10 5 12 23 30 23 22 25 2 1 19 27 19 16 35 2 19 36 34 22 18 1 21 23 25 12 32 13 19 33 15 22 15 16 11 25 21 33 20 32 7 4 18 28 15 12 33 7 34 27 2 12 4 22 6 1 24 22 15 2 4 14 24 23 29 20 5 13 7 7 31 10 20 29 28 12 30 11 23 1 13 10 35 3 3 18 7 14 33 30 6 25 20 2 16 10 3 25 5 24 26 1 33 17 29 34 2 26 17 3 17 25 34 20 4 4 14 29 32 14 36 4 13 13 18 23 1 30 30 1 4 9 18 24 19 23 8 34 13 17 25 28 14 18 28 15 10 15 17 36 5 15 23 30 15 10 13 26 12 30 31 2 10 16 8 17 10 16 13 -1 7 30 6 5 15 28 9 3 +0 21 17 17 +1 3 24 22 21 21 13 14 19 12 4 3 34 8 1 35 We will compare this with using correlation correction using two attempts and not singel attempts to gain +1. If you find a way - i should aslo mention that you can end one attack at +0 if there is no direct gain of +1. =_0

To understand this post you have to read previos posts. Aim with singel units attacks - here is a march i have not tested more then some short sampels around 100 000. This is just a short sampel using one even money position to describe the march using one unit singel attacks - then notice you dont capture correlation of correction you capture raw correction as an direct oppisite effect - wish is more difficult. 1) You wait for the distribution after 3.0 or above stop hovering around values with up and downs with plus/minus 123 chops in any direction - being a wave or state where there is no significant tendency. a) After four series chop in a row - then you wait it to end and wait for two new series to chop and attack once to gain +1 - if it fails you repeat the same attack two more times until you have a total loss of -3 units or a gain with +1 unit. Even money. Three attempts. Random org 2010 07 26 Result: +1 -3 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.04:39 events --------------------------------------- 16 8 16 22 34 3 2 17 25 11 19 19 10 1 27 18 16 12 10 14 24 31 24 25 12 32 17 19 6 9 13 3 20 32 27 10 16 26 14 1 32 35 5 14 24 36 1 20 7 22 23 11 9 20 16 *** 30 3 30 34 22 15 15 26 19 7 35 5 31 5 18 24 35 19 34 7 19 24 11 5 34 4 18 25 19 17 26 29 24 32 36 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.06:47 events --------------------------------------- 13 27 2 11 27 15 7 4 16 22 8 11 22 29 32 15 12 12 10 34 8 33 29 33 34 9 7 18 19 19 20 36 33 8 33 22 21 11 33 9 31 25 2 29 13 4 23 6 10 23 33 31 10 34 17 2 24 20 2 33 16 17 16 6 18 11 22 19 20 3 24 5 14 36 25 3 14 30 24 34 24 34 22 *** 2 15 14 14 7 24 3 16 23 10 9 3 19 8 25 25 14 4 28 30 8 19 21 17 32 34 2 1 2 17 13 29 11 14 12 1 19 13 11 18 27 21 4 7 6 28 32 21 18 30 12 24 30 -1 14 11 25 15 12 14 23 10 32 21 29 35 30 28 -2 8 31 15 7 16 10 4 -1 6 33 11 15 10 36 22 -2 9 19 21 23 13 5 28 15 14 11 12 16 31 24 35 8 25 24 -3 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.13:20 events --------------------------------------- 31 29 19 10 7 4 21 13 7 29 8 25 6 25 8 21 3 2 13 13 10 10 15 32 10 9 31 1 4 *** 31 31 30 19 6 35 23 12 36 27 8 2 12 30 22 16 7 23 33 1 17 10 30 12 35 24 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.00:16 events --------------------------------------- 12 30 3 36 32 28 5 10 7 6 7 36 20 27 19 14 14 28 1 11 25 28 27 11 34 *** 13 15 7 19 23 8 20 7 9 11 22 15 20 29 36 18 4 10 3 26 23 30 20 14 32 8 12 25 32 21 5 22 2 31 20 16 33 -1 16 27 8 29 33 5 7 +0 14 20 6 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.13:20 events --------------------------------------- 16 26 12 35 11 1 15 36 28 5 28 5 17 5 25 17 27 32 22 7 15 5 31 *** 6 6 9 28 10 30 14 19 25 31 14 12 18 5 35 2 31 10 16 33 16 13 11 34 36 18 27 11 27 2 30 26 19 19 12 26 6 16 35 26 33 2 15 29 16 16 25 31 33 20 28 6 19 36 2 18 36 29 35 21 12 +1 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.00:16 events --------------------------------------- 30 30 8 25 26 12 32 22 18 15 9 24 27 30 1 14 27 20 7 6 27 15 32 *** 18 27 24 19 7 4 33 4 4 36 13 11 13 9 6 10 14 24 28 33 8 13 3 9 29 6 18 26 30 1 12 6 32 20 18 10 27 19 19 25 19 30 36 3 24 17 20 18 27 3 25 27 27 20 35 36 5 18 22 34 5 8 4 27 4 16 34 8 23 9 36 25 16 36 10 25 24 23 25 11 26 26 20 36 31 -1 25 8 5 16 8 34 3 7 12 21 6 31 25 16 +0 30 14 10 10 +1 13 32 30 --------------------------------------- R/B:Singles vs Series:SD=3.02:28 events --------------------------------------- 23 7 32 34 19 31 12 11 18 28 16 10 18 17 14 1 35 30 5 1 16 16 17 3 4 15 10 3 13 4 11 6 29 6 31 19 8 31 25 20 32 31 14 33 5 35 *** 7 1 29 32 7 9 15 10 36 22 14 25 5 7 29 2 7 4 10 5 12 23 30 23 22 25 2 1 19 27 19 16 35 2 19 36 34 22 18 1 21 23 25 12 32 13 19 33 15 22 15 16 11 25 21 33 20 32 7 4 18 28 15 12 33 7 34 27 2 12 4 22 6 1 24 22 15 2 4 14 24 23 29 20 5 13 7 7 31 10 20 29 28 12 30 11 23 1 13 10 35 3 3 18 7 14 33 30 6 25 20 2 16 10 3 25 5 24 26 1 33 17 29 34 2 26 17 3 17 25 34 20 4 4 14 29 32 14 36 4 13 13 18 23 1 30 30 1 4 9 18 24 19 23 8 34 13 17 25 28 14 18 28 15 10 15 17 36 5 15 23 30 15 10 13 26 12 30 31 2 10 16 8 17 10 16 13 7 30 6 5 15 28 9 3 21 17 17 +1 O_o

Optimierer 1) Develop The March. 2) Get Statistics There is a variation if some one use only one singel attack to capture or use two attempts to capture - benifits and down side. The aim is +1 and that it should overcome the amount of attempts - if you succed you have an complete playing model. 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I will show you some more exampels and put it in "code" mode with next post so you can follow different options. O_o

Thanks for a very nice post. The distribution is in a "state" wish is "isolated" with in the first "100 trails" <<< This mean that any one can prove with singnigicant statistcal sampel that "correlation of correction exist for the next 200 trails". 1) If that is the truth and a fact we have an degree how high probability to actualy know what will apper in the future with out using an crystal ball. a) That is if we agree on that the "state" or waves of hovering and seris to chop is part of correction - the correlation of two state of the distrubution wish apper with no doubts after an Ecart at 3.0 or above - even less can be used around 2.5. When i post a simpel suggestion for observation i just want to post one easy way how to capture bouth state with two bets - nothing advance. You are correct when you assume that one good way is to attack only once with one unit - to capture a short state of correction. After that attack it should be based upon tendency play - wish mean that you wait for two series to chop - as that would be a stronger indication for a tendency to a draw-down - wish also would only be one unit. If a loss repeat the last tendency again with a total aim with 3 units. This march above does not work - it has a to large variance. Building an march and capture correlation of correction is about playing safe and the only option to do so is to find a way to capture two state. But aim for singels attack with only one unit is also good as it limits the amounts of attempts to capture +1 unit. It makes me happy that you show intresst in this - because this is the very best work that has been done regarding even money bets. I have statistics that show a net gain of 5000 Euro with 4 weeks of play - but that is papper work. Capture a short state as an direct effect of correction after an strong ecart is more in line with gambling. One could wait for chops of two states before and attack and repeat does until +1 unit. One could use many different options. +1 is serios money - placing 700 Euro with La Partage Rule with a % on zero - then it is not pean nuts any more and no need for many betting signals during 4 weeks of observation and tracking. It is actualy about getting +3 but that is advance strategy - but with a good option for capitilation of money. +7 that allow you to place two more bets 33 and if +1 again you are up +10 and you can never lose as after your first +7 you will allways be at least +1 if you lose your free ride of 33 - wish and if end up +1 allow you to lower your bet once more to 11 and if +1 you have a net gain of +11. The % on zero with reduce the 1100 Euro wish you earn - but again it is small pean nuts regarding the insurence you have to cover zero with the lower amount of money. O_o

My personal favorite is series contra singels. R-2.24 E 1.51 L 1.02 R-1.96 E 1.51 L 1.21 B-1.96 E 1.51 L 1.21 B-1.71 O 1.51 L 1.21 R-1.71 E 1.30 L 1.21 R-1.46 O 1.10 L 1.21 B-1.46 E 0.90 H 1.21 B-1.22 E 1.06 H 1.41 R-1.22 O 1.06 L 1.41 R-1.00 E 0.88 H 1.15 R-1.00 O-0.85 L 0.89 R-1.00 O 0.87 L 1.09 R-1.00 O 0.87 H 1.09 B-1.00 O 0.87 H 1.28 B 0.85 O 0.87 H 1.28 B 0.85 E 0.87 H 1.28 B 0.85 E 1.00 L 1.28 B 0.85 E 1.00 L 1.46 B 0.85 E 1.00 H 1.46 R 0.85 E 1.00 L 1.22 R 0.88 O 1.00 L 1.40 R 0.88 E 0.85 L 1.40 R 0.88 E 0.97 H 1.40 B 0.88 E 0.97 L 1.18 B 1.02 E 0.97 L 1.35 B 1.02 O 0.97 H 1.35 B 1.02 E 0.80 H 1.51 B 1.02 O-1.00 H 1.51 B 1.02 E-1.21 L 1.51 B 1.02 E-1.00 L 1.67 R 1.02 E-1.00 L 1.67 B 0.87 O-1.00 L 1.67 B 1.00 O-1.00 H 1.67 R 1.00 O-1.00 H 2.00 R 1.21 O-1.00 L 2.00 R 1.21 O-1.00 L 2.18 B 1.21 E-1.00 L 2.18 B 1.50 E 0.90 H 2.18 B 1.50 O 0.90 L 1.89 R 1.50 O 1.04 H 1.61 R 2.00 O 1.04 H 1.79 B 2.00 O 1.04 L 1.79 B 2.50 O 1.04 H 1.53 R 2.50 O 1.04 L 1.33 B 2.50 E 1.04 L 1.48 B 3.00 O 0.88 H 1.48 */37 R 3.00 O 1.02 L 1.30 */38 R 3.15 O 1.02 H 1.12 */39 B 3.15 O 1.02 L 0.95 */40 B 3.30 E 1.02 H 0.78 */41 B 3.30 E 1.15 H 0.93 */42 R 3.30 O 1.15 H 0.93 */42 B R 7 +7 B 3 +10 R 1 +11 O_o

This is theory. Lets assume you would only use one option as singels contra series and not aim to track down all - then there will be a delay for betting oppertunites. The andvantage of using one tracking method only for a certan state of the distribution is that you limit fluctation to destry your play. As with the playing model to isolate and know what will happen in the future to a certan degree of high probabilty based upon signigicant statistical data. It would also apply to isolate one state of the distribution to one isolated variance of fluctation. Multy methods attacks could correlate many situation of fluctations - wish you would like to limit. Is it worth it if you find a way and can verify with statistics. Well it depends on if some one use 70 Euro units as base bet size or 100 Euro as base bet. +1 unit add up to serios money - if a postive expectation exist - but i am not here to claim there is an edge or andvantage. I am only her to share some basics regarding even money bets. Now i will end this topic - but if there is questions i will be happy to help out. O_o