Mellis

I should also mention that a state of two hovering formations also apply for attack as formation and first attack fail. Here is todays random org 2010 07 26 with sampel size 10 000. Flat betting result with 6 attempts using the simpel idea of a march above. +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 -6 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 Won +25 Loss -6 Total gain +19 Advance strategys. Is to use 7 unit bet size and after +1 lower the bets to a 3 unit bet size - that will allow you to place two more bets / one more attack with out losing. If you after +7 would use 33 for one more attack and lose you will still won +1 and if you win be up +9. If a win you could again lower your bet size to 1 and play one more attack using 11 and as above after the first +7 you could never lose having a free ride for two more attempts to ride the correlation of correction. O_o

Flat betting and using a specific march to capture correlation of correction - this is just ILLUUSTRATION FOR YOU TO DEVELOP YOUR OWN OBSERVATION -i just post this to give you an hint. 1) This march is based upon one simpel idea and has not been testd - this exampel is juat an part of an existing march and its not complete - i dont give away complete work that has been done - it is private. 2) The rule for this march is as follows. After an Ecart pass or are at 3.0 and end with a serie - you attack and play there will be one more serie as a part of an short state of correction of two series to chop - if a loss you place a new bet that the distribution will start to hovering and that the Ecart wont grow any more. Formations. R R R B B Place a bet. or R R R B R R Place a bet. That is the first attack with two attempts out of a toatal of 6 attempts. If the first attack end at break even point you continue until you reach +1 unit or a loss of -2 units. 3) If the first attack fails you will wait for one hovering state and a chop - wish is a state of two elements to indicate tendeny or you will wait for two series to chop - when this indication of tendency state appers you are allow to attack for the secound time - using two bets and follow the march mentioning above - same betting behavior - the goal is to gain +1 or end up with a loss with -2 units. If the secound attempt fails you repeat the same attack again - until you have a total loss of 6 attempts or -6 units as a total loss. Some times the winning has a sharp edge using this method - wish is under construction and only for illustration for you to learn how the distribution unfold and how there might exist others ways then does i mention. Short test - sampel 10000 - 6 attempt using the march above - flat betting. +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 -6 +1 +1 +1 Won +20 Loss -6 Total gain +14 O_o

Now before i start to post different observations i would make some-things clear. 1) Here we deal with singels contra series - what does that mean ? a) That singels is more present then series - series are less present then singels. b) It is an 1/2 situation if we just view singels and series - same as red and black - but we use the observation of the law of series. c) We can measuring the waves and use probability with an comfort delay - relax and observe and only attack depending on mehtod - end - indication - tendency. d) We can confirm with significant statistical sampels that correction exist - if we use and isolate it to an playing model wish follow certan rules and agree on that the two state of waves out of three is an part of correction. 2) The three waves and state that we have to deal with using this exampel with singels contra series is as follows. a) We have to find a strong state with singels wish hit an Ecart at 3.0 or above - where no series with in that window has appers more then twice at most. b) Then we look for the others state to apper - hovering and series to chop. Illustration of the state hovering. RRR B RRRR B RRRR or BBB R BB R BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB R BBBB Illustration of the state of series to chop. RRR BB RRRR BBB RR BBBBBB or BBBB RRR BB RRRRRRR BBB 3) The question is - would we aim for an direct correction using indications and attack or would we use tendency play and attack after fictive winning bet. a) The andvantage with indication attack is that small states appers regulary and can be capturing with only two small or large bets. c) The andvantage with tendency attack is that at some moment the correction will apper - but it can become an bumpy ride. Next i will post exampel of indication attacks and tendency attacks as i mention above - just wanted to post some basics first. O_o

Maybe hunter translate this - he is very cool in my book. If you make many many observations - then 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 of the correction is what you will see and get - greed make it fail. With the simulation software it use two methods among others i mention. Singels contra series is what your Ecart simulation software will let you run. There is no point looking at if a serie makes 2 3 4 or even 100 reds in a row - skip it. Same apply for series contra singels - it is just reverse. There is three things wish i mention above in previos posts. Stronger Weaker Hovering End Indication Tendency So when singels alternating and give you a strong Ecart with at least 3.0 - an momentum of a window with in the first 100 trails - then for the next 200 there will be correction - any one is free to prove me wrong and load as much data you want. The issue is how we define correction - hovering is a state when it stop and end growing and is an part of correction and the draw-downs are an direct effect of correction. I will run some simulations and show you the flow of the correction and the random behavior - soon. Note the software also following one rule wish is that it only allow two series to chop twice or less with in an Ecart of 3.0 or above. O_o

Well that was all and thanks for being so polite and i did translate some replys - i am to old with to much real knowledge and experience to let some one to get to me. I wish Sache read my other post and give me a comment regarding my other post about visual ballistics. Take care and have fun. O_o

Feel free to do your own observations. This is just some parts of the knowledge i have regarding this from the material i have - its now my work - it is Margnys work. First you have to study how the ecart can grow stonger " hovering " and get draw-downs = ends " indications " tendencys .... when you master a relax way of doing thing in an humber way to ride out and gain +1 - then you can start to think about the house edge.

You can only download 100 000 a day from random.org - that is 3 x even money bet = 300 000 a day. You can save the file out put with every Ecart and its particular correction wish give you a gain of +1 - depending on how you would capture one. Go to random.org and load 1 to 36 and save it with a txt wish you load and click next to get the sofware to find Ecart at least 3.0 or above. Then spin and see how the Ecart get stronger or start to hovering or get weaker. What i say above is true - the next 200 will give you many ends"indications"tendencys - have fun. O_o

https://www.bredbandsbolaget.se/portlet-b2-...atrmell/övrigt/

Just want to mention and i notice that i am not allow to give or post link to simulation software - i did post it but i guess i am not allow to do so. Take care. O_o

As i promisse above. Singles contra larger series of singles. Pick an random file from today at random.org. 1 and 2 can stand for Black and Red for roulette or Banker and Player for baccarat 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 Ecart 3.15 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 Indication 1 1 Tendency 2 2 1 1 6 Singles 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 Singles 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 Singles 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 4 Singles 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 5 Singles 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 Singles 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 O_o

Hello. First i did some-thing wrong adding the simulation software for every one to use. Well it is an loop hole ... and i can explain - but first i want to give away simulation software and how to does who find it intressting to get there own statistics and method. Masse Egale is simpel and the truth behind it is simpel. To get true flat betting to work - some one has to have an posititve expectation - wish i dont claim you will get with this method. You have to find a method how to capture the indication or the tendency wish i mention above. And the attempts of attacks doing so has to overcome the gain of +1 unit. Raw and simpel would be just attack when there is a fictive +1 of draw-down and follow that flow. I reacon for does who has the balls can play with large units and limit there way with a humbel fibo. There is no house edge using this method - as some one would prefer to place a % on zero tax and only play dose tabels wish have an La Partage rule. Where you only lose half your bet on even money position. Here is a short exampel over statistics. Attack attempts = how many attempts to capture +1 flat betting = 7 attempts. X = End of day. 87/35 920108 +1 920108 +1 920115 +1 920124 +1 920127 +1 920131 +1 920205 +1 920207 +1 920211 +1 920213 +1 920214 +1 920218 .X 920219 .X 920302 +1 920325 -7 920406 +1 920428 +1 920519 -7 920520 +1 920527 +1 920609 +1 920612 +1 920613 +1 920617 +1 920622 +1 920716 +1 920720 +1 920723 +1 920729 +1 920810 .X 920818 +1 920820 +1 920824 +1 920826 +1 920827 +1 920903 +1 920904 +1 920909 .X 920915 +1 920923 +1 920924 +1 920930 +1 921002 +1 921005 +1 921005 +1 921014 +1 921022 +1 921024 +1 921027 +1 921030 +1 921101 +1 921111 +1 921112 +1 921112 +1 921114 +1 921116 +1 921117 +1 921120 -7 921209 +1 921212 +1 921215 +1 921219 +1 921221 +1 921222 +1 930113 +1 930114 +1 930117 -7 930117 +1 930204 +1 930204 +1 930221 +1 930223 +1 930301 +1 930302 +1 930304 +1 930304 .X 930305 +-0 930307 +1 930324 +1 930326 +1 930330 +1 930331 +1 930406 -7 930406 +1 930407 +1 930425 +1 930428 +1 930507 +1 930507 +1 930510 +1 930516 +1 930517 +1 930520 +1 930529 +1 930601 +1 930622 +1 930626 +1 930628 +1 O_o

I add one software below. Click on it and load numbers, sampels 10.000 or above. Click on next to get the sequense with 3.0 or above. Click on spin to see how the flow after 3.0 or above unfold it self with draw-downs. Get your sampels from random.org - 100% pure random - depending on what you find out with your own statistics. With this you have the software capture 3.0 with singels contra series. You will try to capture draw-downs of RR BBB and RRR BB RRR and RRR BBBBB RR BBB and so on. You will try to capture hovering where the Ecart dont grow stronger any more RRR B RRRR and RRR B BBB R BBBBBBB R BBBB and so on. Hybrid would be the combination of bouth i mention above. Have fun. See attach file. O_o

1) Series contra singles. 2) Singles contra series. 3) Singles contra series of singles. 4) Series of singles contra singles. 5) Series contra larger series. This is just some dimension how you can apply math, probability. Here is the values for small series contra larger series. Singles has the value of 0 Series of two has the value of 1 Series of three has the value of 0 Series of four has the value of 1 Series of five has the value of 2 Series of six has the value of 3 And so on Here is an exampel of an statistical ecart of 3.0 ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ......... LOW ........ LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW ......... LOW HIGH .......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH ......... LOW ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW ..........LOW..............14 series of two and two series above HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH ........ LOW HIGH HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW What is due and what is negative expectation when you capture correction. Well the strategy is simpel with measuring and following certan rules. Track a window of 100 trails where with in you have to capture an Ecart at 3.0 or above "contra" next 200 wish is the future where correction appers - but you have to find a method to capture the tendency towards correction. There is three waves - Ecart getting stronger or hovering or getting weaker. Some simpel exampels how it looks like. Exampel with slight correction and low ecart. Here is an demonstration how the random flow behave where I show how the statistical ecart grow and get all the elements we have talk about above. Pick an random file from today at random.org. This is how the law of series will unfold it self. Singels contra series. 2 x 1 x 2 x 1 1 1 1 2 x 1 x 2 x 1 x 2 x 1 x 2 x 1 1 2 x 1 x Statistical Ecart around 2.5 2 2 2 End 1 2 2 2 2 2 Hovering 1 2 1 Get stronger Ecart 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Hovering 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Hovering 2 1 2 2 2 2 Hovering 1 1 Indication 2 2 2 Tendency 1 1 2 1 1 1 Hovering 2 1 1 1 Hovering 2 1 1 1 Hovering 2 1 2 1 2 Ecart get sronger and so on... 1 1 The Ecart has to apper with at least 16 events - where on singel and one serie is one event - at it is due if it pass with in a frame above 50 events. Back to topic Regarding if some-thing is due or not is useless and just show who have read this topic the wrong way. This topic is about tendency not to hunt for a serie or singles to end. It does not matter if you get 100 reds in a row it still has an value of 1 and are one serie. We could even talk about 100 alternating series and it still does not matter. Because the only thing that happens with the last one is that the statistical ecart grow. Well now regarding how to grasp this I will make it clear and it is easy. Lets assume we have 1000 alternating series and they end with two singles outcomes. Then it would look like this. 998 series and BBBPPPPP B P Now here we actually only know that this sequence end with one singles outcome because we don't know what the last one will become. There is only an end for the statistical ecart to grow at this momentum. Now lets assume we get one more singles and then we know we have two because the last one we don't know what it will become. 998 series and BBBPPPPP B P B Now there is an indication that it has not only stop it continues to drop. Then now we could argue that it can go back to back and grow any more and hit an higher statistical ecart. Well lets keep on track here and assume we get one singles event again. Now there is an tendency for an draw-down. 998 series and BBBPPPPP B P B P This is end, indication and tendency. With this you will see how the random flow hovering around an low statistical ecart that grow slowly or jump quick in one direction or go back and fourth between two directions or hovering at zero point. Then there is time when the statistical ecart grow and get very strong in one direction. Now you know how to measure the random flow with this simple concept. Next I would will show you some samples with an predefined march that capture an draw-down. Keep in mind that many can say many things with little to show or illustrate it with. Distribution with in the distribution - advance - singels contra larger seris of singels - illustration exampel. When i use numbers 1 and 2 it can apply to any even money bets - as the random flow is based upon noise and 100% pure from random.org. Post sampel soon as i did not find it now. O_o

Here is an simple chart that I did a long time ago with some values that you can use as reference. The french word for Standard Deviation is Ecart and will be the name I use from now on. First you have to get the Absolute Ecart when you calculate. So lets assume you have an sequence with 14 series alternating with two singles present. Then you take 14 - 2 = 12 Now we want to get the statistical ecart so we continue with... 14 + 2 = 16 Now we take the sqr of 16 = 4 And finally we divide the absolute ecart whit the sqr 12 sqr 4 = 3,00 The Statistical Ecart 3,00 The values is 1 for singles and 1 for series. RRR BBB RR BBBB RRR BBBBBBB RRRR B RR BBB RRRRRR B RRRR BBBBB RRRRR BBBBB RR = 14 series and two isolated singels. The variation is many and you can have a team tracking all wheels for the first 100 to find an Ecart at 3.0 or above. Singels contra series Series contra singels Illustration and exampel with series contra singels. Statistical Ecart 3,00 R R R B B R B B B B R R B B B R R B B R R B B R B B R R R R B B R R B B..3,00 R..R B..B Indication R..R R. R B B R..R B..B Indication R..R R B..B R..R Indication R B..B R..R Indication B..B B - R..R B..B R..R Tendency B..B R..R B..B B R R B..B R..R Indication B..B B The correction does not have to come like above - it is a good exampel - but during the next 200 they will apper - so it is true correction exist - but it is not the same thing as saying you have a winning method. The corrections comes in waves - the only thing you can no about the future is that they will apper - but you dont know with how long or short strings they will come with. It can start hovering and as series has the value of 1 and singels has the value of 1 then this is how it looks like. RRRR B RRRR B RRRR B R BBBB R BBBB = 10101012101 I will show you the variations of targeting small series contra larger series - post like this just to give you a simpel view of Marignys work. O_o

As the wheel has 37 or 38 degree of freedom - this would not work. But - if correlation of events and the distribution line of the "observation" - The Law Of Series has it own limits with in a time line - then there is correction. To make it simpel if you have or take the first 100 trails and get singels and series of two isolated in a window of 100 trails - then we would expect for the next 200 trails to get larger series to apper and use a method to capture does - correction. For beginners i can give you the probability - the math - the method and some statistics - with some simulation software to do your own home work. But again the wheel has 37 or 38 degree of freedom and same should apply to any kind of distribution as the observation wish is not a law of the series. Keep this in mind as i post. O_o

First of all i read about does Roulette-computers. Taking one full spin development and all does clicking - because in a later state use 2 rev to key the norm. That using a static reference point doing so. 1) One spin development of split-times is not accurate and based upon the wrong principal using a static reference point. 2) Key the norm using two rev with static reference point is all wrong - as the momentum is not static when you key the norm and a static reference point can not be accurate to measuring it. Then i ask regarding time-frame - that some wheels has better correlation with a tight spreed to end. The wheel is rounded and we can predict wish deflector can hit during a later rev towards end. But then it has to be away to move up in the hierarchy being more early but get a wider spreed and we dealing with 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75. That will give us a 2 pin game out of three - like having a semi tilted wheel where the bias is towards two deflectors. I have not all the necessary collected data for this - but sure did made this observations. Luck or not - only a significant sample would tell. After that is not an issue to apply the sweet speed and adjust fudge factor with a 2 pin game and variations of rotor speeds. I guess it would be a difficult task depending on when some one place hes bets down - using dual areas wish is not a static 180 degree. I assume it maybe would cut 10.34 10.22 10.54 to half - but you higher up before smack - so much better - smile ... O_o