Mellis

If i understand it correct you want to learn about advantage play - i read some of the replys and it was boring - buth that is what you get out of the community being protecting to certan degree. I do not give away things on a silver plate - but i can point my finger to does directions you should aim for. You can start with VB2 and the DS wish they mention in same section at myrulet. Read new and old posts about RC and other things wish will in the end as you start your new jorney to calibrate things and find your path. I would recommend that you buy LS advance book wish at least give you a sofware and a period of time at the spin-zone - where you will find some very good things if you back track and read old and new posts. LS know many things and will help you with all your questions to a certan degree. PB yes that is good and start with hes last book and go backwards and find correlation wish has been mention above. I assume that if you follow what i tell you - then after a certan time depending on your learning curve you will thank me for this. Does who not ask has nothing to gain. Maybe one day you start to think twice about what you post - wish is a good sign. O_o

If you want to get your hands on a roulette computer - i would say FFZ - my opinion - but my advice is not to invest money into that path. My opinion is that you will do as well using a thumper in your mobile phone or develop a good head count and using how the norm calibrate wish will give you the same accuracy as any FF for sale - i would not suggest sound patterns as it is very advance but i assume you could apply it to certan degree to find the moment to key when to glance at the wheel. You just need a littel knowledge :-) and yes it takes time and is a long jorney to succed - but at least if you want to be lazy you will gain a edge using FFZ - but you still need some basic skills to operate that kind of roulette computer - even with the other models of FF you have to have certan degree of skills and knowledge - there is actualy no short cut - it is important to know that. I assume if you invest money in good material and hang around different internet forums you will succed to make contact and build trush during your jorney - wish can lead to that some one decide to pass over some knowldedge and get you started. Have a nice day. O_o

I use babel fish to translate and read the topics and could not find PM function using it - so here it is - [email protected] When u look for a wheel - Huxley with 8 deflectors - this is important to know as follows. The aesthetic appearance of the roulette wheel is what determines how expensive or cheap it is. Then determine how old wheel is also affecting the price. A good buy at low cost is to buy a Huxley who is not as beautiful but with good ball track - with good CONDITIONS. The aesthetic of a wheel can get the price to be unnecessarily expensive. We do not use a wheel to enjoy its beauty. We use a wheel for a different reason O_o

I assume its about getting a wheel - correct ?? PM me and i give u my contact wish can deliver that wheel. All from old to almost brand new from factory at x contry. O_o

If you want to trade i will offer u the following - i would not trade how to spot defects - but i could show u how you beat modern wheels for bias where you can make your own simulations and tell the difference what is due to random fluctaion and what is not due to random fluctaion using a specific playin model - short avoid all does false postives and know the true difference. If ok i have to ask for preimission to do so. Or you can name a price wish i would prefer is lower then does at amazon or ebay. O_o

Kaisan does not need to teach me about sound signature or other things - i find a way to collect them for real - i start to build a small libary using the same method as taking lap/split times - i notice a variation from a grind joint comparing to my old huxley at home wish have a new ball track and with does at my local international casino - i go deep into it and not just key clattering wish become sworfh. I use audio software and tweak and take a closer look at does sampels i have. The point is regarding any VB method is that many old things in the past is a part of the new age of andvantage play. Sure i hear all kind of good things about Sachse - but i do my own home work based upon parts wish is not public or that you can find on internet in a public forum ... sure hints can lead to many things. There is so many different kinds of VB and in the end when some one has the knowledge of middel or higher they can move forward with out wait for some one to hand some-thing over on a silver plate - we all have the abiltiy to collect and measuring what is what and improve and find new solutions. I want mention any name but one forum wish deals with a famous succes full roulette computer brand - was impressive at first - but as time pass by you start to notice wish false postives they are based upon. Exampel taking one spin development and base that upon how you key the norm using two turnarounds wish can lead to false postives - where a sampel of least 20 lap/split will show a wheels true ball track and ball behavior wish you base futher on your ability to key the norm - some methods works on certan wheels and some does not - as huxley is easy to find the average around 0.9 1.0 1.1 and with other wheels around 1.5 and where you can not apply same method wish force some one to use different playing model. Just speak free from mind ... Regarding Pierre Basieux i assume it depends on wish eyes read and observe what he has to say wish will lead to if it is any good or not. The old is part of the new and good basic foundations of what has been done and what is being done today is a good overview wish only can lead to deeper and better understanding. O_o Translations takes time and there is also a book from Chriss wish i would like to buy.

greetings - mauvecard ... I come from Abba contry :-) I just ? but reach a point where i start to look back on old work wish has been done regarding visual ballistics. It had been cool to start to know new pepole in EU and maybe team up with some on wish is on same page as me. I take my first trip to x and y wish has ?? casinos to explore the market for certan things using defect spotting wish save time and effort and dont wast time to collect data with out any real pontential and hope for luck would strike me. I go 27th but would not brag or claim being semi pro even if i have the knowledge. O_o

Thanks I know its heavy to translate as i do with hes latest book - i use babel and it works. O_o

Do some one know where i can find a complete list of the books Pierre Basieux wrote or if he still has a site up running - he did before but i have lost the link. Many thanks.

HAHAHA as this was the first time a get this message O_o

I am going to be honest with you all - i dont use or play even money bets - it is just that no one can compete with the knowledge i have regarding even money bets. I only know one and it is Laurance wish claim have some kind of poitive expectation and get it verify by Snowman. It just strike me after study Marigny for many years that two states and two isolated attacks for every attempt to capture correlation of correction is more effective then to aim for raw correction. Saying it does not exist is just being stupid. O_o

Give me that slow knowing smile +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 +8 +1 +1 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +8 +1 +1 +11 +11 +1 +8 +11 +11 +11 234 units flat betting O_o

Now i skip all previos march variation at previos post using my method of "correlation correction" and aim with the TPM = The Perfect March. I start to test it with advance strategy 731 and i have to say it is beatiful. Thank you Marigny. Here is a short exampel and it is for 40 sessions i will see what the net gain will be. I just post 12 session and alredy serios amount of units. +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 106 units in 10 000 trails using one even money position. O_o

I took the new development that has been made upon Marignys work and concentrate on the Perfect March. I imporve it with using correlation of correction instead of raw correction. My first test using only one even money position gave me an amazing positive expectation. This i think will be a very good option for real play with larger units with 100 Euro value. Here is a simpel test and i only use random org as it is pure random and based upon noise. Flat betting with 6 attempts where +1 overcome the amount of attempts. The Perfect March. My own depelopment. 2010 07 29 to 2010 08 31. +1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 32 won 0 loss 32 net I understand why there is so littel response to what i write. Many claim but can not prove what they claim. I welcome any one to prove me wrong. O_o

Sorry the caculation was wrong i miss one -28 hehehe as that would matter LOL Flat betting - Advance strategy 731 random org 20100725 / +8 +11 -28 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 / won +54 units / loss -28 units / total gain +26 units random org 20100726 / +1 +1 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 / won +44 units / loss -0 units / total gain +44 units random org 20100727 / +1 +1 +1 -28 +11 -28 +1 +8 +11 -28 / won 34 units / loss -84 units / total gain -50 units random org 20100728 / +11 +11 +8 +11 +11 +11 +8 +11 +1 +1 +11 +11 / won 106 units / loss -0 / total gain +106 Result: +92 units Won 176 units / loss -84 units / total net gain 92 units Note. With reduce of % on zero during play. Now it should be correct i just do things so quick as i just enjoy it. Assume 70 Euro units then we have 920 Euro and with 700 Euro units we would have 9200 Euro.